Search the Archive
  Home
  Welcome to
  Station Information
  Mathematical and
  Natural Sciences

  Astronomy
  Biology
  Chemistry
  Computer science
  Earth science
  Ecology
  Health science
  Mathematics
  Physics
  Statistics
  Applied Arts
  and Sciences

  Agriculture
 
Architecture
  Business
  Communication
  Education
  Engineering
  Family and
  consumer science

  Government
  Law
  Library and information
  science

  Medicine
  Politics
  Public affairs
  Software engineering
  Technology
  Transport
  Social Sciences
  and Philosophy

  Archaeology
  Economics
  Geography
  History
  History of science
  and technology

  Language
  Linguistics
  Mythology
  Philosophy
  Political science
  Psychology
  Sociology
  Culture and
  Fine Arts

  Classics
  Cooking
  Dance
  Entertainment
  Film
  Games
  Gardening
  Handicraft
  Hobbies
  Holidays
  Internet
  Literature
  Music
  Opera
  Painting
  Poetry
  Radio
  Recreation
  Religion
  Sculpture
  Sports
  Television
  Theater
  Tourism
  Visual arts and design

State


 

This article discusses states as sovereign political entities. For other meanings, see State (disambiguation).


In international law and international relations, a state is a political entity possessing sovereignty, i.e. not being subject to any higher political authority.

The definition of "state" in the meaning of a political subdivisions of some countries, is related as it emphasizes the intention of a confederation where these state governments are seen as possessing some powers independently of the federal government. Often these states existed before their creation of a federal régime.

In casual language, the idea of a "state" and a "country" are usually regarded as synonymous, although some speakers, notably in the United States, make efforts to use "country" or "nation" for the sovereign entities. Others would primarily understand "the State" as a synonym for "the Government", or be careful to distinguish between a territorial "country" and a "nation" of people.

The legal criteria for statehood are generally accepted to be those set out in Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention. "The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states." (The Montevideo is a regional American convention; but the principles contained in this article have been generally recognized as an accurate statement of customary international law.) However, some have questioned whether these criteria are sufficient.

A major issue is the difference between the constitutive and declarative theories of recognition of states. According to the constitutive theory, a state exists only insofar as it is recognized by other states. The declarative theory, by contrast, holds that the existence of a state is independent of its recognition by other states. Which theory is correct is a controversial issue in international law. An example in practice was the collapse of central government in Somalia in the early 1990s: the Montevideo convention would imply that the state of Somalia no longer existed, and the subsequently declared republic of Somaliland (comprising part of the so-called "former" Somalia) may meet the criteria for statehood. However the self-declared republic has not achieved recognition by other states.

A further controversy, within political philosophy, centers on the question of when the state came into being, and what its basic characteristics are. The sociologist Norbert Elias famously defined the state as an institution that has a monopoly on legitimate violence in a particular geographic area. One of the most basic characteristics of a state is regulation of property rights, investment, trade and the commodity markets (in food, fuel, etc.) typically using its own currency. Although states increasingly cede these powers to trade bloc entities, e.g. North American Free Trade Agreement, European Union, it is always controversial to do so, and opens the question of whether these blocs are in fact simply larger states. The study of political economy which evolved into the modern study of economics studies these specific questions in more detail.

A problem is that states are often to some extent dependent of dominant and more powerful states, and/or by their free will subject to higher political authorities, as for instance the United Nations, the European Union, the World Trade Organization or other international organizations. However, although states often are in practice subject in this way, they are much stronger in relation to international organizations or other states than lower (substate) political subdivisions normally are in relation to states. But the trend at the moment is for the power of superstate levels of governance to increase, and there is no sign of this increase abating. Many (especially those who favour constitutional theories of international law) therefore reject as outdated the idea of sovereignty, and view the state as just the chief political subdivision of the planet.

See also:








Site Partners

Easy Encyclopedia
Small Business Forum
Free Web Templates
Free Mortgage Quote

  This content from wikipedia is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License