Search the Archive
  Home
  Welcome to
  Station Information
  Mathematical and
  Natural Sciences

  Astronomy
  Biology
  Chemistry
  Computer science
  Earth science
  Ecology
  Health science
  Mathematics
  Physics
  Statistics
  Applied Arts
  and Sciences

  Agriculture
 
Architecture
  Business
  Communication
  Education
  Engineering
  Family and
  consumer science

  Government
  Law
  Library and information
  science

  Medicine
  Politics
  Public affairs
  Software engineering
  Technology
  Transport
  Social Sciences
  and Philosophy

  Archaeology
  Economics
  Geography
  History
  History of science
  and technology

  Language
  Linguistics
  Mythology
  Philosophy
  Political science
  Psychology
  Sociology
  Culture and
  Fine Arts

  Classics
  Cooking
  Dance
  Entertainment
  Film
  Games
  Gardening
  Handicraft
  Hobbies
  Holidays
  Internet
  Literature
  Music
  Opera
  Painting
  Poetry
  Radio
  Recreation
  Religion
  Sculpture
  Sports
  Television
  Theater
  Tourism
  Visual arts and design

Geocentric model


 
The geocentric model of the cosmos is a paradigm which places the Earth at the center of the universe. Common in ancient Greece, it was believed by both Aristotle and Ptolemy. Most Greeks assumed that the Sun, Moon, stars, and planets orbit Earth. Similar ideas were held in ancient China.

The geocentric model was gradually replaced by the heliocentric model of Copernicus and Galileo due to the simplicity and predictive accuracy of that newer model.

In this model, a set of fifty-five concentric crystalline spheres were considered to hold the Sun, the planets, and the stars. These spheres (called deferents) revolved at varying velocities around the Earth to account for the rising and setting of celestial objects every day.

However, this simple model of the revolutions of spheres could not explain all astronomical phenomena. In particular, planets were observed to wander across the fixed fields of stars over time; mostly they wandered in one direction, but occasionally they seemed to reverse course. To explain this strange retrogradation, Aristotle claimed that planets were attached, not directly to deferents, but to smaller spheres called epicycles. The epicycles were themselves attached to the deferents; the simultaneous revolution of both sets of spheres created an occasional apparent reversal of the planets' motions across the skies of the Earth.

Ptolemy further modified this model to more accurately reflect observations by placing epicycles upon epicycles, creating an extraordinarily complicated--but fairly accurate--depiction of the cosmos. He also displaced the Earth from the center of the universe, claiming that, while Earth was enclosed by the celestial spheres, the spheres actually revolved around a point called an eccentric, which was near the Earth but not quite on it.

This elaborate theoretical system stemmed largely from one important observation. If the earth did move, then one ought to be able to observe the shifting of the fixed stars due to parallax. In reality, the stars are so far away that this motion is undetectable without careful telescopic observations, but the lack of parallax was considered the death of any non-geocentric theory for a thousand years.

The Ptolematic model is however incompatble with observations of a gibbous Venus. Observations such as this led to interest in the Coprenician system and the Tychonian system.

This view of a geocentric universe held sway for well over a millennium, until the publication of Copernicus's De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium in 1543.

See also:








Site Partners

Easy Encyclopedia
Small Business Forum
Free Web Templates
Free Mortgage Quote

  This content from wikipedia is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License